SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 723

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Lichhmanram – Appellant
Versus
Girdhariram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
K.R. Godara, for Petitioners;
B.L. Bishnoi, for Respondent No.1

JUDGMENT

'kekZ] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr lgk;d dyDVj ,oa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ihikM+'kgj }kjk izdj.k la- 38@2003 esa vius fu.kZ; fnukad 19-11-2004 }kjk vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 14 fu;e 2¼2½ ,oa vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lifBr /kkjk 151 lhihlh [kkfjt dj fn;k] ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSaA

2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ fxj/kkjhjke us ,d jktLo okn LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ,oa ?kks"k.kk dk lgk;d dyDVj ,oa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ihikM+'kgj ds U;k;ky; esa bl vk'k; dk is'k fd;k fd xzke ljfx;k [kqnZ rglhy Hkksikyx<+ dh ljgn esa [ksr [kljk ua- 20 jdck 1 ch?kk dk [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkosa] D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k us mls tfj;s cspku fnukad 16-3-78 dks 5 fcLok Hkwfe csph rc ls vizkFkhZ ml ij dkfct gSA jftLVªh esa 5 fcLok Hkwfe xyr fy[kh gqbZ gS tcfd 1 ch?kk Hkwfe [kjhnh xbZA blfy, mls 1 ch?kk Hkwfe dk [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkosaA izkFkhZx.k us tokc nkok is'k fd;kA izdj.k esa rufd;kr dk;e dh xbZA nkos ds fopkjk/khu jgrs izkFkhZx.k us ,d izkFkZuk i= vge fook|d fcUnq dk;e ugha gksus ckcr is'k fd;k] ftls fopkj.k U;k;ky; us Lohdkj dj vfrfjDr rudh ^^okn U;k;ky; ds {ks=kf/kdkj ds laca/k esa** dk;e dh xbZA rRi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top