G.K.TIWARI
Anchhi – Appellant
Versus
General Manager (Recovery) State Financial Corporation, Janjati Vikas Bhawan, Pratapnagar, Udaipur – Respondent
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case leading to the revision are that one Sohan Lal Jingar, the non-petitioner No. 3, took loan from Rajasthan Financial Corporation (in short `R.F.C.'). For having defaulted on paying an outstanding sum of Rs. 10,92,100/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs ninety two thousand and one hundred), the R.F.C. initiated proceedings for recovery of outstanding sum under Section 256/257 of the Act of 1956. Following the laid down procedure Tehsildar Rajsamand attached the house of the defaulter-loanee the non-petitioner No. 3 by the order dated 19.5.08 which was challenged in appeal under section 75 of the Act of 1956 before District Collector Rajsamand who dismissed the appeal by the impugned judgment dated 26.2.2010 against which the instant revision petition is preferred in this court.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Dy. Govt. Advocate.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.