2010 Supreme(Raj) 930
[Citation : 2011(1) RLW 182 (SC)]
(Supreme Court)
C.B.I. Vs. Kishore Singh & Ors. (Katju, J.)
HON'BLE MARKANDEY KATJU, J.
HON'BLE T.S. THAKUR, J.
Central Bureau of Investigation
Versus
Kishore Singh & Ors.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 2047-2049 of 2010, decided on 25.10.2010
Headnote:Penal Code, Sec. 342 read with 326 and 120-B — Criminal act committed by policemen — Punishment — Held — Policemen who commits criminal acts deserve harsh punishment than other person — It is the duty of policemen to protect the people and not break the law themselves — Sentenced Rigorous imprisonment and in case of fine deposited shall be paid to the victim as compensation. (Paras 31 to 33)
n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 342 lifBr /kkjk 326 ,oa 120-[k & iqfyl dehZ }kjk vkijkf/kd d`R; fd;k x;k & ltk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & iqfyl dehZ tks vkijkf/kd d`R; djrs gS os vU; O;fDr;ksa ls dBksj ltk ikus ds ;ksX; gksrs gS & ;g iqfyl dfeZ;ksa dk drZO; gS fd os yksxksa dks laj{k.k iznku djs ,oa Lo;a dkuwu Hkax ugha djs & dBksj dkjkokl dh ltk nh ,oa tqekZuk tek djkus ij og izfrdj ds :i esa ihfM+r dks fn;k tk;sxkA ¼in la[;k 31 ls 33½
vihy Lohdkj dhA
2. What should be done to policemen who `bobbitt’ a person in a police station and think that they can get away with it? That is the question to be decided in this case.
3. These appeals by special leave have been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 19.11.2008 passed in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 235/2006, SB Criminal Appeal No. 31/2006 & SB Criminal Appeal No. 70/2006 of Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur.
4. This case reveals how some policemen in our country have not got over their old colonial mentality and are still persisting in barbaric acts in a free country which claims to be run by a democratic Constitution and the rule of law. It also reveals a grisly state of affairs prevailing in our police set up even today.
5. Heard Mr. J.S. Atri, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, CBI, Mr. KTS Tulsi, learned senior counsel for respondent constable Kishore Singh, Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel for respondent Assistant Sub-Inspector Sumer Dan and Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned counsel appearing for respondent S.H.O. Sohan Singh.
6. The prosecution case is that one Jugta Ram, the injured witness in this case, was an employee of one Bheru Singh and was working in his liquor shop. Jugta Ram also lived in the house of Bheru Singh in one room of the upper floor, while the family of Bheru Singh was living in the ground floor. Bheru Singh had two sons and three daughters. Jugta Ram is said to have had an affair with Bheru Singh’s wife and eldest daughter. This was suspected by Bheru Singh, whose relative was accused constable Kishore Singh.
7. On 2.2.1994, at about 8 P.M. Jugta Ram was carrying a bottle of liquor when accused constable Kishore Singh met him and snatched the liquor bottle and in the course of the scuffle the bottle fell down and got broken. Kishore Singh then took Jugta Ram to the Sadar police station where the accused SHO Sohan Singh and some policemen were also present. Sohan Singh allegedly assaulted Jugta Ram and at that time Bheru Singh also came to the police station. Accused Kishore Singh, constable, is the son of Bheru Singh’s brother-in-law (sala).
8. Jugta Ram was taken to the police station on 2.2.1994 and kept locked up there till 5.2.1994. He was beaten up in the police lockup by Bheru Singh, constable Kishore Singh and A.S.I. Sumer Dan. On 4.2.1994 at about 2 or 3 P.M., Jugta Ram’s brother Kheraj Ram came to the police station and he stated that the policemen demanded Rs. 40-50 thousand otherwise Jugta Ram will not be released.
9. On 5.2.1994, Jugta Ram was again assaulted by Bheru Singh, Sumer Dan and Kishore Singh who kept asking about his illicit relationship and then he stated that he had illicit relationship with Gaj Kanwar, wife of Bheru Singh. At this, Bheru Singh and Sumer Dan caught hold of Jugta Ram. Accused A.S.I. Sumer Dan held Jugta Ram by the neck and put his hand on his mouth and then accused constable Kishore Singh chopped off Jugta Ram’s penis with a sharp edged weapon (‘ustra’ or barber’s razor). At this, Jugta Ram became unconscious and when he gained consciousness he found that he was admitted in Barmer hospital.
10. Jugta Ram related the story to the doctors in the hospital and also his brother Kheraj Ram who came there with some persons.
11. The police registered the F.I.R. of Jugta Ram on 5.2.1994 under sub-Section 307/326. Initially the investigation was handed over to the Additional S.P., Barmer, but thereafter it was transferred to the C.I.D., Crime Branch which added the offences of Sections 343 and 120B I.P.C. Thereafter, at the instance of the State Government the investigation was transferred to the C.B.I., which investigated the case and submitted a charge sheet.
12. The accused denied the prosecution case, but the trial court found all the three accused guilty vide its judgment dated 21.12.2005. The fourth accused Bheru Singh died during the trial.
13. The trial court sentenced accused Kishore Singh to rigorous impri