SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 871

SANGEET LODHA
Yashodhara Ameta – Appellant
Versus
Vishnu Shanker Paliwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.C. Bhoot, for Petitioner;
Vivek Shrimali, for Respondents

Hon'ble LODHA, J.—This revision petition is directed against order dated 12.2.09 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) No. 3, Udaipur in Civil Misc. Case No. 6/04 whereby an application preferred by the petitioner raising objections under Section 47 read with Section 151 CPC in Execution Case No. 7/04 raising objections against execution of the decree, stands rejected.

2. The relevant facts in nutshell are that Shri Vishnu Shanker and four others filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed dated 19.12.67 alleged to have been executed by one Shri Kundan Lal (since deceased) in favour of Ganesh Lal and Amba Lal. It was averred in the plaint that the disputed property belongs to Nandir Thakurji Charbhuja Ki Bari of Bada Paliwal Samaj and therefore, late Shri Kundan Lal had no right to sell it.

3. The suit was decreed by the trial Court in favour of the plaintiffs vide judgment and decree dated 7.3.90.Aggrieved thereby two appeals were filed; one by Ganesh Lal & Amba Lal and another by legal representative of Kundan Lal, Shri Shiv Shanker.

4. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties in the appeal preferred by Shri Ganesh Lal and Shri Amba Lal, entered into a compromise and subm



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top