SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1040

[Citation : 2011(1) RLW 697 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
Captin Gurvinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. (Mishra, CJ.)
HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA, CJ.
HON'BLE MAHESH BHAGWATI, J.
Captin Gurvinder Singh & Ors.
Versus
State of Rajasthan
D.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.13491, 12810 & 13884 of 2009, decided on 22.12.2010

Advocates Appeared
S.P. Sharma, Shobhit Tiwari & Sandeep Singh, for Petitioners;
P.P. Rao, Senior Counsel, G.S. Bapna, Advocate General, V. Garg, Sarvesh Jain, Praveen Poswal for V.S. Gurjar & R.R. Baisla, for Respondents

Headnote:Rajasthan Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes, Special Backward Classes and Economically Backward Classes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions is the State and of Appointments and Posts in Services under the State) Act, 2008, Sec. 3, 4 and Constitution of India, Art. 15 and 16 (as Amended) — Vires of the Act of 2008 — In every case where the State decides to provide for reservation there must exist two circumstances, namely 'backwardness' and `inadequacy' of representation' — Backwardness has to be based on objective factors where as inadequacy has to be factually exist — In case state wants to exceed 50% reservation then it is required to base its decision on the quantifiable data — Held — State Government has not made any study or collected the quantifiable data which is necessary — Sec. 3 and 4 of the Act of 2008 and Notification of enhancing financial limit of creamy layer should not be given effect. (Paras 13, 17 to 19)

       jktLFkku vuqlwfpr tkfr] vuqlwfpr tutkfr] fiNM+h oxZ] fo'ks"k fiNM+k oxZ ,oa vkfFkZd :i ls fiNM+k oxZ ¼jkT; esa 'kS{kf.kd laLFkkvksa esa lhVksa dk vkj{k.k vkSj jkT; ds rgr lsok esa fu;qfDr;ksa ,oa inksa esa vkj{k.k½ vf/kfu;e] 2008] /kkjk 3] 4 ,oa Hkkjr dk lafo/kku] vuqPNsn 15 ,oa 16 ¼;Fkk la'kksf/kr 2008 ds vf/kfu;e dh 'kfDrerk & izR;sd ,sls ekeys esa tgka ljdkj vkj{k.k gsrq micU/k djus dk fofuf'p; djrh gS ogka nks ifjfLFkfr;ka vo'; fo|eku jgrh gS tSls ^fiNM+kiu* ,oa ^izfrfuf/kRo dh vi;kZIrrk* & fiNM+kiu mn~ns'; ijd dkjdksa ij vk/kkfjr gksuk vko';d gS tcfd vi;kZIrrk dk rF;kRed :i ls fo|eku gksuk vko';d gS & ;fn ljdkj 50% ls vf/kd vkj{k.k nsuk pkgrh gS rks mls viuk fu.kZ; x.kuk ;ksX; vkdM+ksa ij vk/kkfjr djuk t:jh gS & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & jkT; ljdkj us ,slk dksbZ v/;;u ugha fd;k ;k ,sls x.kuk ;ksX; vkdM+s ,d= ugha fd;s tks vko';d gS & 2008 ds vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 3 o 4 vkSj Øhehys;j dh foRrh; lhek c<+kus okyh vf/klwpuk dks izHkkoh ugha fd;k tkuk pkfg;sA ¼in la[;k 13] 17 ls 19½

       ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dhA

Hon'ble MISHRA, CJ.—These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners assailing the vires of Rajasthan Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes, Special Backward Classes and Economically Backward Classes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions in the State and of Appointments and Posts in Services under the State) Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2008”). Prayer has also been made to direct the State Government to review the ceiling limit of reservation in favour of SC, ST and OBC of 16%, 12% and 21% respectively.

2. Facts are being noticed from Civil Writ Petition No.13491/2009 wherein the petitioner no.4-Samta Andolan, which is a registered society, has submitted that constitutional intent is to reduce the reservation. It is submitted that the foremost requirement for reservation is to collect quantifiable data in overall State relating to the population as well as relating to economical standard of the caste in general and people in that caste in particular. After having collected such datas and further making a comparative statement with respect to other castes in the State only for the purposes of providing upliftment of particular class or caste, reservation can be provided. 100 point roster is being applied and reservation has been increased. The Act of 2008 has been published in the Rajasthan Gazette on 31st July, 2009 under which various castes including Gurjars and Rebaries have been included in the SC/ST, OBC, Special Backward Classes (SBC) and Economically Backward Classes (ECB). While enacting the aforesaid Act of 2008, the State has not relied upon any census conducted in this regard and no exercise at the level of the State was ever done to ascertain whether any particular caste is actually socially backward or not. The petitioners sought information under the Right to Information Act which indicates that no such study has been undertaken by the State Government. It is further averred that so far as Gurjars and Rebaries are concerned, they were included in Other Backward Classes. However, due to political stir, the State Government without examining the issue, came up with the Notification dated 31st July, 2009 notifying the Act of 2008. Now, reservation of seats in educational institutions in the State has been provided to the extent of 68% to SC, ST, OBC, SBC and EBC. 16% for Scheduled Castes, 12% for Scheduled Tribes, 21% for Backward Classes, 5% for Special Backward Classes and 14% for Economically Backward Classes with the rider that persons belonging to the creamy layer shall not be eligible for consideration against the reserved quota of seats in any educational institution in the State. However, provision of creamy layer shall not be applicable to the reservation for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The aforesaid reservation in service has been provided vide section 4 of the Act of 2008. As per mandate of the Supreme Court in M.Nagaraj & Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors. ((2006) 8 SCC 212), no quantifiable datas are being collected of various castes or so called backward classes in the State of Rajasthan. In-fact, there was no need for giving any further reservation as by efflux of time, there is upliftment of the persons belonging to backward classes. The petitioners have applied for furnishing certain datas, but that has not been furnished. However, whatever datas, which have been furnished, indicate that State has no reliable and up-to-date datas regarding representation of the different class or caste in the public employment. Adequate representation does not mean proportionate representation. With the passage of time, most of the tribal population have lost their “tribal” character and does not fulfil the criteria laid down by the Apex Court for providing reservation. All tribal groups have been represented in public employment not only adequately but more than proportionately.

3. The State Government has also issued Notification dated 25.8.2009 in






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top