RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.
Dr. Ajay Kumar Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4676 of 2000.
Decided On : 27-08-2002
Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Issue related to mala fide transfer – It was observed that transfer is very much required for better administration as prolonged posting at one place raises fears of vested interests – no immunity to doctors in medical colleges from being transferred – transfers amenable to judicial review on the grounds of mala fide, extraneous considerations, against public interest or if out of transferrable cadre.
Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Issue in the case was what would amount to mala fide in case of transfer - Held that mala fide in such cases includes malice in law as well as in fact – if the transfer has no reasonable nexus with administrative convenience or without any reasonable basis, such a transfer would amount to malafide.
Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Issue was whether the transfer made in the instant case on the ground of administrative exigency was mala fide – Held administrative exigency calls for need of better administration – If the criteria of qualifications or eligibility is ignored while making a transfer, it cannot be said to be for better administration.
The petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Medical Officer on 5.9.1990 and, thereafter, he was selected through Rajasthan Public Service Commission and was given posting as Assistant Professor in Radio-therapy in S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur vide order dated 3.8.1991.
On 19.2.1992, the petitioner was ordered to be transferred from S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur to S.P. Medical College, Bikaner and again on 28.1.1998, the petitioner was transferred on the post of Associate Professor and was given posting at J.L.N. Medical College, Ajmer.
Thereafter, on 29.6.1999 through Annex.1 the petitioner was ordered to be transferred from J.L.N. Medical College, Ajmer to S.P. Medical College, Bikaner and in pursuance of that order, the petitioner joined his duty at S.P. Medical College, Bikaner on 3.7.1999.
The further case of the petitioner is that by the same order Annex.1 dated 29.6.1999, the respondent No. 3 was also ordered to be transferred from Bikaner to Ajmer, but the respondent No. 3 did not execute the said order and he was adjusted at Bikaner itself against the post of Associate Professor, Forensic Medicines vide order dated 7.7.1999 (Annex.2).
The further case of the petitioner is that though the respondent No. 3 was working at Bikaner for the last 17 years and he had not executed the transfer order Annex.1, all the same he was even adjusted against the post of Associate Professor in Forensic Medicine, whereas he was Associate Professor in Radio- therapy.
It was further submitted by the petitioner that since thereafter, the State Government decided to send all the persons to their respective posts in their subject, therefore, the respondent No. 3, who was working on the post of Associate Professor in Forensic Medicines for which he was not qualified, therefore, he was transferred vide order dated 17.5.2000 and was posted as Associate Professor in Radiotherapy at Ajmer and he was relieved for joining his duty at Ajmer on 7.8.2000 and for that, order Annex.3 dated 7.8.2000 may be referred to.
Thereafter, vide impugned order dated 10.8.2000 (Annex.4), the respondent No. 3 was again transferred from Medical College, Ajmer to Medical College, Bikaner in place of the petitioner and the petitioner has been transferred from Medical College, Bikaner to Medical College, Ajmer in place of respondent No. 3.
The further case of the petitioner is that the respondent No. 3, who was ordered to be relieved on 7.8.2000 through Annex. 3 for joining his duties at Ajmer, was again transferred within three days from Medical College, Ajmer to Medical College, Bikaner in place of the petitioner and the petitioner has been transferred from Medical College, Bikaner to Medical College, Ajmer in place of the respondent No. 3 through order Annex.4 dated 10.8.2000 and thus, the respondent No. 3 has been adjusted at Bikaner and this order Annex.4 has been issued at the instance of respondent No. 3 and therefore, this order Annex.1 dated 10.8.2000 is mala fide and the same has been challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition.
The petitioner approached the Rajasthan
Mr. Shilpi Bose v. State of Bihar 1993(3) SCT 564 (SC) = (AIR 1991 SC 532)
Union of India v. S.L. Abbas 1995(4) SCT 455 (SC) = (AIR 1993 SC 2444)
N.K. Singh v. Union of India 1995(1) SCT 269 (SC) = (1994) 6 SCC 98)
State Bank of India v. Anjan Sanyal 2001(2) SCT 817 (SC) = (2001) 5 SCC 508)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.