SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1417

PRAKASH TATIA
Het Ram Soni – Appellant
Versus
RSEB – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. D.S. Shishodia, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26th July, 1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar in Civil Original Suit No. 2/98 by which the learned trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.

2. Brief facts of the case are the plaintiff-appellant is consumer of the respondent No. 1 (defendant No. 1) having the electric connection in the name of Sona Rubber Udyog. The account number of the plaintiff is MIP 702. The plaintiff alleged that a notice was issued by the Asst. Engineer of the respondent No. 1 on 6.2.97 stating that during inspection it was found that three industrial units Hencock Rubber Industries account No. MIP 33, Kalpatru Industries account No. MIP 36 and Sona Rubber Industries account No. MIP 702 are running in the same premises having common entrance and approach. The work of above three industrial connections carried out by one concern/proprietor. Therefore, as per the sub-clause (c) of condition No. 5 of the General conditions of supply all the connections are required to be clubbed together and, therefore, the plaintiff should make necessary arrangement for clubbing of three connections within
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top