2002 Supreme(Raj) 1417
PRAKASH TATIA
Het Ram Soni – Appellant
Versus
RSEB – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. D.S. Shishodia, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Advocate.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26th July, 1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar in Civil Original Suit No. 2/98 by which the learned trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.
2. Brief facts of the case are the plaintiff-appellant is consumer of the respondent No. 1 (defendant No. 1) having the electric connection in the name of Sona Rubber Udyog. The account number of the plaintiff is MIP 702. The plaintiff alleged that a notice was issued by the Asst. Engineer of the respondent No. 1 on 6.2.97 stating that during inspection it was found that three industrial units Hencock Rubber Industries account No. MIP 33, Kalpatru Industries account No. MIP 36 and Sona Rubber Industries account No. MIP 702 are running in the same premises having common entrance and approach. The work of above three industrial connections carried out by one concern/proprietor. Therefore, as per the sub-clause (c) of condition No. 5 of the General conditions of supply all the connections are required to be clubbed together and, therefore, the plaintiff should make necessary arrangement for clubbing of three connections within
Click Here to Read the rest of this document