SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1495

J.C.VERMA
Kamal Dhawla – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Katta – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.L. Agrawal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This revision petition has been directed against the order dated 26.7.2000 passed by Additional District Judge No. 4, Jaipur in 1st Appeal No. 27 of 1998, whereby the application under Order 6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code filed by defendant-petitioner has been rejected.

2. The respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for ejectment on the ground of reasonable bona fide necessity. The suit was decreed and against the judgment and decree of trial Court, regular 1st appeal was preferred, which is pending before the first appellate Court. During pendency of appeal when the case was fixed for final arguments, the application under Order 6, Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code was moved by defendant-petitioner for amendment of the written statement. The application has been dismissed by the order impugned.

3. The amendment being sought was that the accommodation has been made available to plaintiff for doing the business, which is based on certain record i.e., telephone bill in the name of plaintiff. The application was dismissed for the reasons mentioned in the order. The Court had observed that no such document has been placed on record to show that plaintiff had acquired any shop so as






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top