SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 1117

ARUN MADAN
Ramji Lal – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mrs. Madhuri Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length and also perused the relevant documents on the record. The case of the petitioner in short is that he was appointed as Patwari in Patwar Circle, Bamanwas Chaugan. During the period 29-30.5.1981, a revenue campaign was held by the directions of the District Collector (Land Record), Alwar for assessing the work performance of the revenue officials of the area concerned. The petitioner who was then serving as a Patwari was authorised for maintenance and upkeep of the revenue records and also to see that no unauthorised person can take benefit in this regard. During the course of campaign, it was brought to the notice of the concerned authorities that the land bearing Khasra No. 52 was recorded in revenue records in the share of Rameshwar son of Gopi, Moolya son of Balu, Narayan son of Reward etc. all by caste Haryana Brahmans. One of the recorded Khatedars of the land bearing Khasra No. 52 namely; Ram Kishore came out in the campaign and requested that his name be entered in the revenue records in place of his adoptive father Shri Narayan son of Rewad. The petitioner being the Patwari of Patwar Circle made a report to th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top