1992 Supreme(Raj) 536
G.S.SINGHVI
Gauri Lal – Appellant
Versus
Gujar Mal through his Legal Representatives – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellant:R.M. Lodha, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Rajendra Soni, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - This second appeal arises out of a suit for rent and ejectment filed by late Gujarmal against the appellant Gauri Lal.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 17-12-80 landlord Gujarmal, filed a suit against tenant Guari Lal with the allegations that he had let out a shop on 12-4-67 on a rent of Rs. 10/- per month for a total period of 11 months. The shop was now required by the landlord for his personal necessity of doing business for vegetable and fruits. He was not having any proper shop for this business and the requirement of the suit premises was reasonable and bonafide. Moreover, the defendant-tenant was not doing any business in the shop and had been keeping the shop closed. The tenant himself was owner of the four shops and he is also having ten shops in Tijara. He had sold two shops. Another ground of the eviction was that the tenant had let out the Chabutra to some other person. The tenant denied the averments relating to reasonable and bonafide personal requirement of the landlord and stated that the had been doing business in the shop and the livelihood of his own and his family depended on the business in the disputed shop.
3. During the pendency of the sui
Click Here to Read the rest of this document