SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 639

G.S.SINGHVI
Shiv Charan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M.M. Ranjan, Counsel.
For the Respondent:Mr. J.M. Saxena, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - In all these writ petitions the petitioners have questioned legality of the orders relating to promotions made on the post of Teacher Gr. II and their reversion from the post of Teacher Gr. II to that of Teacher Gr. III. Since facts of the cases are similar and common questions of law have been raised for determination, the only appropriate course for this court is to decide all these writ petitions by a common order.

2. In order to appreciate the contentions of the petitioners, I deem it proper to make reference to few facts from each of the writ petitions.

3. In writ petition No. 222/94 Shiv Charan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and others, the petitioner has stated that he passed B.A. from the University of Rajasthan in the year 1978 and B.Ed. from University of Ajmer in the year 1988. He joined Government service as Teacher Gr. III on being appointed as such by the District Education Officer, Jaipur-I (Boys Institution), Jaipur. In the seniority list of Teacher Gr. III of district Jaipur, name of the petitioner has been included at serial No. 791/71-82. In the year 1991 an eligibility list of teachers, who were entitled to be considered for promotion for the year 19
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top