SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 602

A.K.MATHUR, B.R.ARORA
Anita – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Mr. M. Mridul, Mr. R.C. Maheshwari and Mr. B.C. Shansali, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. J.P. Joshi, AAG.

JUDGMENT

1. - This writ petition and other writ petitions mentioned in the Schedule annexed with the judgment involve a common question of law and fact. Therefore, they are disposed of by the common order.

2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the matter, the facts given in the case of Mrs. Anita Kothari (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1908/89) are taken into consideration from convenient disposal of all the writ petitions.

3. Petitioner is post-graduate in English. She entered the Service of the Government of Rajasthan as Lecturer in English in the year 1982. At the relevant time the Rules were in force are known as Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1971, hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1971. Petitioner continued on the post of lecturer and her order was revived every year after academic session and she continued till she was relieved in the year 1989. She filed the present writ petition that she had been in service for more than 7 years and Public Service Commission has not advertised the post. She further submitted that she had to face the ordeal of appearing before the temporary selection committee every year for her recruitment. Meanw

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top