SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Raj) 249

G.M.LODHA
Siya Sadan – Appellant
Versus
Sagar Mal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Shri K.N. Tikku, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Shri A.K. Bhandari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. "Shocking scarcity of a chhappar, roof to rest" results in stretching of the bones on payment of Chopati Kalba Devi, Bada Bajar, Dharam Tala, Chandni Chowk, Panch Batti and Sojati Gate, the prestigious shopping Centres, exposing the gyprocratic flooded lights over dark dry shopping skeletons of poor, down trodden pavement dwellers India, have compelled the 'patrogonists of social justice' to adopt beneficial interpretation for protecting tenants from evictions under the Rent Control laws of the land. But the ingenuity of the legislators sat and resourceful segment of landlord lawyers want to overstep intention of the legislators and crusadors of 'social justice' by enacting 'Merchant of Venice and Portia' to make tenants defenceless and deprive them from the valuable right of defence against the ejectment, by hyper technical interpretation of sub-sections (2), (3) & (5) of Section 13 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950.

2. The point of debate in the instant case therefore is between the interpretation of rent laws in consonance with 'social justice' against the hair splitting interpretation based on blind law by accepting "Pound of flesh an







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top