1982 Supreme(Raj) 249
G.M.LODHA
Siya Sadan – Appellant
Versus
Sagar Mal – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellant:Shri K.N. Tikku, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Shri A.K. Bhandari, Advocate.
JUDGMENT :
1. "Shocking scarcity of a chhappar, roof to rest" results in stretching of the bones on payment of Chopati Kalba Devi, Bada Bajar, Dharam Tala, Chandni Chowk, Panch Batti and Sojati Gate, the prestigious shopping Centres, exposing the gyprocratic flooded lights over dark dry shopping skeletons of poor, down trodden pavement dwellers India, have compelled the 'patrogonists of social justice' to adopt beneficial interpretation for protecting tenants from evictions under the Rent Control laws of the land. But the ingenuity of the legislators sat and resourceful segment of landlord lawyers want to overstep intention of the legislators and crusadors of 'social justice' by enacting 'Merchant of Venice and Portia' to make tenants defenceless and deprive them from the valuable right of defence against the ejectment, by hyper technical interpretation of sub-sections (2), (3) & (5) of Section 13 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950.
2. The point of debate in the instant case therefore is between the interpretation of rent laws in consonance with 'social justice' against the hair splitting interpretation based on blind law by accepting "Pound of flesh an
Click Here to Read the rest of this document