1. - I have heard learned counsel for both the parties at length.

2. So far as the question of defaults in payment of rent is concerned, the learned District Judge has given the details regarding the payment of rent made from May, 1975 to July, 1976. The argument of learned counsel for the appellants is that the date in respect of money-order coupons, which have been considered by the learned District Judge, represented the date on which the money-orders were received back after refusal thereof. For the purposes of Section 13(1) and 19 A(3)(a) and 19 A(4) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, the date of remitting the money-orders should be taken into consideration. Even if, for the sake of argument, the contention of learned counsel is accepted, it appears that at least the rents for the months of June, September, November and December of the year 1975 and March and July of the year 1976, were admittedly neither paid nor tendered within the meaning of being remitted before the 15th of the next succeeding month. I am not expressing any opinion on the question as to whether the date of remitting the money-order or the date of refusal thereof, sh