SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 1337

N.N.MATHUR
Chandra Kalla – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.L. Garg, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. D.D. Kalla, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - By way of instant revision petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioner seeks to quash FIR No. 95/2003 Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh for offence under Section 420 Indian Penal Code.

2. I have perused the FIR. It is alleged that the petitioner herein agreed for sale of her house situated in Nohar to private respondent Suresh Chandra for a sum of Rs. 8,50,000/-. A sum of Rs. 8,00,000/- was paid and the agreement was executed. It is further alleged that after two or three days he came to know that she has already sold portion of house to one Bishna Ram and has taken Rs. 1,00,00/- from him. It is further alleged that Champa Lal and Vinod Kumar later on prevailed upon Bishna Ram and got the agreement cancelled on 15.7.2002. The grievance of the complainant is that the petitioner is not getting the document registered.

3. I have perused the FIR and the relevant record. It is plain and simple case of breach of agreement which is required to be enforced by a suit for specific performance. It does not satisfy the ingredients of offence under Section 420 Criminal Procedure Code.

4. In identical circumstances, the Supreme Court in Nageshwar Prasa




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top