RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.
Dr. Kantesh Khetani and others - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3070 of 2003.
Decided On : 14-12-2004
A. Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 2(ii) - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 16 Held when the payment of stipend is mandatory state cannot differentiate in paying the same- Principle of equal stipend for equal work will apply.
B. Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 16(1) Held in case of non payment of stipend for honorary work- agreement entered into under undue influence is void.
C. Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 2(ii) - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 16 Held unreasonable classification in payment of stipend is liable to be set aside and quashed.
D. Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 2(ii) - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 16 Held degree of skill, strain of work, experience involved, training required, responsibility undertaken, mental and physical requirements, disagreeableness of task are the consideration to be taken while paying stipend.
E. Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 2(ii) - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 16 Held it is nature and quality of work that woek as guiding factor in payment of stipend.
F. Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 2(ii) - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 16 Held where the nature of duties are same and are done under same employer- same stipend to be given.
G. Constitution of India, Article 226 Held denial of stipend amounts to sufficient legal injury and aggrieved is entitled to seek remedy under Article 226 of Constitution.
The Government of India established an autonomous body, which is known as National Board of Examinations (for short "the NBE"), in the year 1975 with the primary objective of improving the quality of medical education by elevating the level of establishing standard of post graduate examinations in modern medicine on all India basis. It was to function as a national resource of imparting quality in evaluation of professional competence in medical sciences. There are more than 135 recognised Medical Colleges in the country and abroad, in addition to over 191 accredited institutions imparting medical education in various levels and in various broad and super specialities. There are 39 medical disciplines identified by the Board for which approved training facilities are available in the country at present. Although the Medical Council of India has laid down standard for post graduate examinations conducted by various Universities and other Institutions, it is felt that the level of proficiency and standards of evaluation still vary considerably in these institutions and universities. Hence, it was felt to set up a national body to conduct post graduate medical examination to provide a common measurement standard and mechanism of evaluation of the minimum level of attainment of the objective for which post graduate degree courses were started in medical institutions. Intercountry and international comparison will be facilitated with the availability of commonly accepted evaluation mechanism.
Thereafter, the Government of India vide Notification dated 19.9.1983 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (ii) of Section (2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1956"), after consulting with the Medical Council of India, amended the first Schedule appended to the Act of 1956 and degrees relating to the NBE were incorporated in first scheduled appended to the Act of 1956.The further case of the petitioner is that they took admission in NBE in different branches in different years and they are working under the respondent No. 4 Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur and the details of their date of admission, branch, experience and name of hospital where they are working are shown in Schedule-A appended to this writ petition.According to the petitioners, they were duly selected in the course conducted by NBE and they are being given training in Diplomate of National Board (for short "DNB") course and they are working in different hospitals of Jodhpur affiliated to Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur (respondent No. 4).According to the petitioners, they were required to work practically as full time Resident doctors in hospital and according to their specialization, they will have to do all works as are being done by MD/MS and for that also, the petitioners will have to work for 12-14 hours daily in hospital, meaning thereby duties and responsibilities of the petitioners are similar and equivalent to that of MD/MS doctors in the same hospital.The further case of the petitioners is that no doubt there was condition in the appointment letter/order of the petitioners that the State Government would not bear any financial liability and furthermore, undertaking was also obtained from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.