SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1317

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Bihari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Mr. M.L. Garg, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. Panne Singh, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. . - This revision petition has been filed by the accused petitioner against the Judgment dated, 10-9-1990 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, No. 2, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Appeal No. 55/87 by which he dismissed the appeal filed by the accused petitioner and affirmed the judgment and order dated 6-9-1985 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No. 16/80 by which the learned Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Mohan Lal and Rampyari for offence under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, but convicted the accused petitioners for offence under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for violation of Condition No. 3 of the Rajasthan Edible and Seeds Trading Licensing Order, 1977 and Condition No. 4 of Rajasthan Oil Seeds Licensing Order, 1978 and sentenced each of them as under :

Name

Conviction u/s

Sentence awarded

Bihari Lal

3/7/EC Act

3 months R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to further undergo 1 month's R.I.

Bihar Lal

Condition 3 of the order 1977

3 months R.I. and a fine Rs. 500/- in default to further undergo I month's R.I.

Mohanlal and co.

3/7 Act











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top