RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
J.C.Verma, J.
Ashutosh - Appellant
Versus
State of Raj and Others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6080/97.
Decided On : 16-10-1998
CASTE CERTIFICATE - VALIDITY - ADOPTED SON OF SCHEDULED CASTE - NATURAL SON BORN TO ADOPTED SON - ENTITLEMENT TO BENEFITS OF RESERVATION - WHETHER A NATURAL SON BORN TO AN ADOPTED FATHER BY A SCHEDULED CASTE IS ENTITLED TO THE BENEFITS OF RESERVATIONS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, born to a father who was adopted by a Scheduled Caste family, was issued a caste certificate declaring him to be a member of the Scheduled Caste. He was selected for a post reserved for Scheduled Castes but was later terminated from service on the ground that the caste certificate was forged. The petitioner challenged the termination of his service.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of reservation as he was born to a Scheduled Caste father and not by voluntary act. The court distinguished the Supreme Court decision in Valsamma Paul (supra), which held that a convert from a high caste to a Scheduled Caste may not be entitled to the benefits of reservations, on the ground that the petitioner in the present case was not a convert but a natural son born to a Scheduled Caste father.
Issues: 1. Whether a person who is adopted by a Scheduled Caste is inducted in the scheduled caste family and becomes the scheduled caste himself and whether such person is entitled to the benefits accruing to the reserve class. 2. Whether a natural son born to such an adopted father by a scheduled caste is entitled to the benefits of reservations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a natural son born to an adopted father by a Scheduled Caste is entitled to the benefits of reservations. The court reasoned that the petitioner in the present case was not a convert but a natural son born to a Scheduled Caste father, and therefore, he did not fall under the category of adoption or inducted in the Scheduled Caste family because of his own volition.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders terminating the petitioner's service.
"It has been submitted by Shri Chetan Bairwa that the order of termination is clearly illegal as the petitioner should not have been dismissed from service without any show cause notice or without granting him any opportunity to explain the position. The submission is partially of some substance.
I, therefore, direct the competent authorities to hold enquiry in regard to the allegation regarding production of forged caste certificate by the petitioner and give reasons for holding so. It goes without saying that if at all the finding regarding forgery committed by the petitioner is found to be un-substantiated, he will be at liberty to move this Court for his reinstatement. The enquiry may be completed preferably within a period of four months."
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.