SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 2007

SANDEEP MEHTA
Sita Ram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan Thro Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Pankaj Gupta, Advocate.
For the State: Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code has been filed on behalf of the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No. 71 of 2012 registered at the police Station, Kolwa, District, Dausa, for the offence under Sections 43, 323, 341 and 308 I.P.C.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosector and perused the case diary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there are cross cases inter-se between the parties. He submits that some persons from the side of petitioner have also received injuries including the head injury received by Smt. Kesari Devi. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the case against the complainant party has been registered for trespassing and causing injuries to the members of the petitioner's party and all the injuries received by the complainant party are simple in nature. He thus, prays that the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the order impugned as well as the material available on th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top