Raju Lal vs The State of Rajasthan - 2005 Supreme(Raj) 2945

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2945

S.C.SINGHAL
Raju Lal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent

For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanjay Singhal, Mr. V.K. Gupta, Advocates.
For the State: Mr. B.N. Sandoo, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. Accused petitioners have filed this criminal revision petition against the judgment & order dated 12.12.1995 of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Gangapur City, confirming the conviction and sentence recorded by the learned trial Court (Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangapur City) dated 11.10.94 for the offences under sections 326 and 326/34. The learned trial court convicted and sentenced the accused petitioners as under:

RajuLal

326 IPC

2 years and 6 months RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- in default to further undergo 3 months SI.

324 IPC

6 months SI and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to further undergo 1 months SI.

323 IPC

3 months SI and to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- in default to further undergo 15 days SI.

Ram Charan

326/34 IPC

2 years and 6 months" RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- in default to further undergo 3 months SI.

324 IPC

6 months SI and to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- in default to further undergo 15 days SI.

323 IPC

3 months SI and to pay a fine of Rs. 50/- in default to further undergo 15 days SI.

Nangu

326/34 IPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2945

S.C.SINGHALRaju Lal – AppellantVersusThe State of Rajasthan – Respondent

S.C.SINGHAL
Raju Lal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent