1. - Heard learned counsel for petitioner Khoobi Ram, learned public prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the relevant documents places before me including the statement of the witness so far examined during the trial as also the order passed on the bail applications of the co-accused persons admitting them to bail.

2. His learned counsel has inter-alia contended that the case of the present petitioner is akin and identical to that of the co-accused person namely; Bhupendra, Bhagwan Singh, Kalua, Collector, Shyamveer, Mukesh, Harvir and Beerbal who have already been admitted to bail. He has also submitted that witnesses Ramkhiladi PW1 and Nawabsingh PW2 have clearly admitted in their cross-examination that they could not tell as to who inflicted which injury. The petitioner is alleged to be armed with a hammer but no specific injury by hammer is ascribed to them and the above said witnesses have also not stated as to which injury was caused by the present petitioner with hammer in the statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. He is alleged to have inflicted injuries on the legs of the deceased with hammer but this is not sup