SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 647

MOHINI KAPUR
Ajanta Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Charan Chatterjee – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Mr. M.C. Sharma and Mr. J.P. Goyal, Advocates.
For the Non-petitioner:Mr. P.C. Jain, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. This revision petition has been filed by the defendant petitioner against two orders of the Additional District Judge No. 4, Jaipur, dated 6th and 7th February, 1987, by which he has allowed the plaintiff petitioner to file a rejoinder to the written statement filed by the petitioner. The second order of 7th February, 1987, is an order by which time has been granted to the petitioner to file revision, which cannot be said to be of any importance in the face of the first order which has to be examined in this revision petition.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that the petitioner is a tenant of non-petitioner No. 1 against whom a suit was instituted on the ground of personal necessity. This suit was decreed by the trial Court and the petitioner filed an appeal which is pending before the Additional District Judge No. 4. During the course of pendency of this appeal, he moved an application for the amendment of his written statement. In order to introduce the facts that the plaintiff-non-petitioner had obtained a decree for eviction against the another tenant one Manmohan Corporation and after executing the same had constructed four show-rooms in that plot, out of which he r









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top