SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1058

R.R.YADAV
Jassoram alias Jassomal – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. J.P. Goyal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The instant appeal is filed against the judgment and decree, dated 28.11.90, passed by Additional District Judge No. 1, Jaipur City Jaipur in Civil Appeal No. 10/89, whereby, the learned ADJ No. 1 Jaipur City, Jaipur affirmed the judgment and decree dated 25.4.89, passed by the Additional Civil Judge No. 3. Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Suit No. 55/86.

2. The plaintiff-appellant filed the present suit for permanent injunction and declaration, in the court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate (West), Jaipur City. Jaipur, making averments in his plaint that he was having a Thadi, bearing No. 21 near Kotwali, Kishanpole Bazar, Jaipur. It is averred in the plaint that the Thadi was allotted to the plaintiff-appellant and he was carrying on his business on the aforesaid Thadi and was regularly paling rent to the Municipal Council, Jaipur. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff-appellant was a member of Purusharthi Thadi Holder's Union (Regd.) Jaipur. But at the time of emergency in the year 1975, all the Thadis were removed and they were replaced at Indira Market, Jaipur. It is averred that in this regard the plaintiff-appellant deposited Rs. 3,500/- with the respondent






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top