SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1658

B.S.CHAUHAN
Nathu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Gulab Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. B.N. Kalla, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court dated 22.9.2001, by which it has affirmed the judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 18.3.1997.

2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the respondent-plaintiffs filed a suit against the appellant-defendants in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nathdwara for permanent injunction on the averments that they were the owners and in possession of the suit property, on which the appellant-defendants were intending to raise construction, thus, they should be restrained from raising any construction thereon. The appellant-defendants filed the written-statement denying the title of the respondent-plaintiffs and claiming their title over the land in dispute. The trial Court, on the basis of pleadings, fronted large number of issues including as to whether the plaintiffs were having the title and possession over the suit property and whether the appellant-defendants wanted to encroach upon the said land. After considering the evidence led by the parties, the trial Court decided both the issues in favour of the plaintiffs holding that the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top