SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 748

SANDEEP MEHTA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Suthar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the State: Mr. A.R. Nikub, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 31.5.2012 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) and Judicial Magistrate, Jodhpur District whereby the application filed by the In-charge Special Investigation Group, Police Commissioner-ate, Jodhpur for handing over the original agreement for getting the same examined for Forensic Science Laboratory has been rejected.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the impugned order.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Borilal alias Bodi Lal v. State of Rajasthan, 2006(1) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 549 , wherein this Court, while considering the provisions of Rule 181 of the General Rules (Civil) 1986, directed the civil Court to keep a certified copy of the said document in the file of civil suit and hand over the original to the Investigation Agency for F.S.L. Examination. The controversy involved in the instant petition stands squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Borilal alias Bodilal v. State of Rajasthan (supra).

4. In the present case also, the trial Court dismissed the appl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top