SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 1379

P.C.JAIN
Pannalal – Appellant
Versus
Punaram – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.L. Chopra, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mishri Lal Chhangani, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The defendant-petitioner has filed this revision petition under Section 115 Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 20.3.1995 passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 2, Jodhpur whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 14, Rule 5, Civil Procedure Code was rejected.

2. The plaintiffs non-petitioners filed a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent on the ground of reasonable and bona fide personal necessity. It was also pleaded by the plaintiffs that the defendant-tenant neither tendered nor paid any rent for the last more than six months.

3. The defendant-tenant-petitioner admitted that he is the tenant in the suit shop but the shop was let out to him by Karnaram in the year 1957 as Karta of the Hindu Family. However on 19.7.1995, a new rent note was got executed, which is a registered document and by virtue of that new rent note, he became the tenant of Mishirilal who is also one of the legal heirs of deceased Karnaram. The defendant also denied that the plaintiffs have got any reasonable and bona fide personal necessity. It was further averred that the defendant ever committed any default in payment of rent and he is regularl














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top