SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1111

ATUL KUMAR JAIN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Mala Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
For the State: Ashok Prajapat, Public Prosecutor.
For the Respondent:Pradeep Shah, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This is an appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment dated 19.1.1991 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No. 112/1988 The State of Raj. v. Mala Ram which relates to FIR No. 64/1988 of Central Narcotic Bureau, Chittorgarh. The learned lower court has acquitted the accused-respondent Mala Ram from the charge under Section 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the N.D.P.S. Act of 1985'). The accused-respondent was charged in the lower court for the illicit possession of 4 kgs. 600 gms. of opium in a suitcase which was being carried in his lap while he was sitting in a public transport vehicle.

2. The grounds taken in the appeal against said acquittal order are as follows:-

(1) that the learned lower court has not properly appreciated the evidence submitted on behalf of the prosecution,

(2) that the statement of PW-1 Satya Narayan has not been relied upon, though he was a trustworthy witness,

(3) that the statement of PW-5 Durga Lal and PW-7 Azizulla were sufficient to prove the charge against the accused respondent,

(4) that the provisions which are not mandatory in the N.D.P.S. Act
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top