2013 Supreme(Raj) 1344
SANDEEP MEHTA
Manish Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
For the Petitioners:M.K. Garg and Pankaj Gupta, Advocates.
For the Respondents: K.K. Rawal, P.P.
For the Respondent No. 2:Shambhoo Singh, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 13.4.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur in revision whereby the learned Sessions Judge has affirmed the order dated 18.10.2011 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Udaipur in Cr. Regular Case No. 157/2009 whereby charges were framed against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 498A and 406 I.P.C.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent no. 2 filed a complaint in the Court of A.C.J.M. No. 2, Udaipur against the petitioners and two others for the offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323 and 420 I.P.C. and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Dowry Prohibition Act . As per allegations levelled in the complaint , the complainant was an original resident of Udaipur. She alleged that after completing post graduation in Zoology, she started working in the Home Loan Department of I.C.I.C.I. Bank at a salary of Rs. 10,000/- per month. It is alleged that accused no. 2 and 3 i.e. Mahendra Kumar Saxena and Smt. Indira approached the complainant's parents at Udaipur and informed them that their son Manish Saxena had completed
Click Here to Read the rest of this document