SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 2205

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Harish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


For the Petitioner:Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vijay Dutt Sharma Deputy Government Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. - Petitioner-Harish Chandra who was appointed in consideration of the fact that his father, who was also Constable, died while serving the respondents, has approached this Court challenging the order of his dismissal dated 19/1/2000 with the prayer that the aforesaid order be quashed and set-aside and respondents be directed to reinstate him in service with consequential benefits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner even though initially made submissions on merits but ultimately confined his argument on the question of disproportionate penalty. Matter is therefore examined on the limited aspect as to if the penalty of dismissal would not be disproportionate to the gravity of proven charge of absence of 44 days or it merited some other penalty.

3. Charge No.1 is to the effect that while the petitioner was undergoing basic training in Rajasthan Police Training Centre Jodhpur, the Principal of the Training Centre by his order dated 21/8/1999 required him to report to the 7th Batallion RAC Bharatpur for performing duties in the parliamentary elections but instead of reporting there, petitioner wilfully remained absent continuously from 22/8/1999 to 4/10/1999. Charge No.2 is










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top