SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Raj) 237

M.B.SHARMA
Shiv Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shusheela Kumari – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.L. Chaudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. A.L. Mehta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This revision petition arises out of the proceedings under section 125 Criminal Procedure Code Notice of this petition was given to the non-petitioners and Mr A. L. Mehta has put in appearance. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. I am of the opinion that record being available, this revision petition should be disposed of at this stage.

2. The learned Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Udaipur City (North) vide his order dated September 14, 1981 holding that petitioner having sufficient means to maintain his wife Smt. Shusheela Kumari and her minor daughter Miss Sandhaya neglected and refused to maintain them and that they have no means to maintain themselves, awarded a sum of Rs. 250 per month from the date of application as maintenance to both the wife and minor daughter.

3. Smt. Susheela Kumari filed an application under section 125 Criminal Procedure Code in the court of learned Magistrate on July 29, 1975 for awarding maintenance @ Rs. 300 per month for both of them. It was mentioned in the application that petitioner was having monthly income of Rs. 1,300 and besides that his mother was running money lending bus







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top