2002 Supreme(Raj) 1749
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.
Prem Chand Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5882 of 1991.
Decided On : 9-09-2002
For the Petitioner:Mr. M. Mridul, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.N. Upadhyaya, Advocate.
For the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2:Mr. Kailash Joshi, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 3:Mr. L.R. Choudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 8:Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Advocate.
Headnote:
Rajasthan Municipal Service Rules, 1963, Rules 7(vi), 26(2) and 27 - Issue in the instant case was what will be the date for determining the seniority in services - petitioner's date of initial appointment on ad hoc basis and of regular appointment were 17.11.1977 and 18.3.1991 respectively - Petitioner pleaded regularization of his services from 17.11.1977 - Claim rejected as the initial period of ad hoc appointment cannot be regularized.
(i) That the petitioner was appointed as Revenue Officer Gr. II by the respondent No.2 Director, Local Bodies, Rajasthan, Jaipur through order dated 17.11.1977 (Annex. R/8/9 filed by the respondent No.8 alongwith the reply) under the provisions of Rules 26(2) and 27 of the Rajasthan Municipal Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules of 1963") on temporary basis for a period of six months or till duly selected persons were made available by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, whichever was earlier.
(ii) That, thereafter, the petitioner continued on the post of Revenue Officer Gr. II even after the expiry of period of six months.
(iii) That since the petitioner did not qualify the tests conducted by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission in the years 1979 and 1986 and failed on both occasions, therefore, his services were terminated vide order dated 12.12.1986 (Annex. R/I filed by the respondents No.1 and 2 alongwith the reply) and at that time, the petitioner was holding the post of Revenue Officer Gr. II. Municipality, Dungarpur. By the same order Annex. R/l, the persons who qualified the tests conducted by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, were appointed as Revenue Officer Gr. II. It is surprising that these facts were not mentioned by the petitioner in this writ petition.
(iv) That thereafter, through another order dated 15.12.1987 (Annex. R/2) issued by the respondent No.2., Director, Local Bodies, Rajasthan, Jaipur, the petitioner was again appointed as Executive Officer (Class IV) on adhoc temporary basis for a period of one year or till duty selected candidates were made available by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, whichever was earlier and he was posted at Badi Sadri. Thus, through Annex. R/2 one more opportunity was given to the petitioner to get himself selected by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission.
(v) That from perusing Annex. R/8/6 dated 7.12.1982, it further appears that the petitioner was suspended on 14.12.1981, but the suspension order was revoked on 7.12.1982 and this fact has also not been mentioned by the petitioner in this writ petition.
(vi) That through Notification dated 18.3.1991 (Annex. 6), amendment in the Rules of 1963 was made and after item (v) of second Proviso to Rule 7 of the Rules of 1963, new item (vi) was added, which reads as follows :
(vii) That the name of Executive Officers Class IV and Revenue Officers Order 11 appointed vide Rule 27 temporarily or in officiating capacity upto 31.3.1979, shall be referred to the Commissio