SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 1426

RAJESH BALIA, PRAKASH TATIA
Legal Heirs of Abdul – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. As the matter can be decided without preparation of paper- book and filing of initial charges and list of documents, therefore, the same are dispensed with and the matter is heard on merits at the request of learned counsel for the parties.

3. The appellant/petitioner Abdul alias Abud, since deceased, was prosecuted in the Court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Barmer under Section 3/6 of the Indian Pass-port Rules on 10.2.81 inter alias on the allegation that accused Abut along with one other person was caught by the patrolling guard/Officers at the Pakistan check post because they were crossing the Indian Border and they were not having valid passports. The accused has stated in his statement that in fact he was going to meet his sister through the way which was passing near the Border and he was wrongly caught. However, this plea was not accepted and he was convicted for the aforesaid offence.

4. After this order of conviction was passed, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under Section 63 (1) (viii) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act for recovery of possession of land from the petitioner/appellant. It was


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top