SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 707

R.S.KEJRIWAL
Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
Eshwar Maudiyani – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:K.N. Srimal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:J.C. Jain, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner has filed this transfer application under Section 24, read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code for transferring the Case No. 70/91, pending in the Family Court of Ajmer, to the Family Court Udaipur.

2. In para No. 4 of the application, the petitioner mentioned that on 29.8.1991, she appeared in the Court at Ajmer, for filing her reply. In the evening, when she was going with her brother to the Railway Station, the plaintiff in the company of two other persons met them. Her husband stood at a distance. One of his friend told her that she was in the company of a Paramour (yar). She protested and told that he was her brother and shouted loudly towards her husband. Her husband came near and told her not to come next time otherwise she would be defaced and her brother would be placed behind bars.

3. In Para 6 of the petition, it has been mentioned that on 25.11.1991 the plaintiff and his friend met her in the evening near the Station and threatened her with dire consequences in case she did not agreed to get the case decided in his favour by a consent order.

4. In Para No. 7, it has been mentioned that there is imminent danger of her being maltreated and defa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top