1994 Supreme(Raj) 842
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
M.P.Singh, J.
Sobha Sharma, Smt. - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5007/1993 .
Decided On : 22-07-1994
For the Petitioner:Mr. Manoj Pareek, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. B.L. Gupta, Advocate
The executive authority does not have the jurisdiction to modify or amend the minimum educational requirements prescribed in the Rules.
Headnote:
PANCHAYAT SAMITIS AND ZILA PARISHAD RULES - RULE 11 - AMENDMENT BY DEPARTMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS - NOT PERMISSIBLE - MINIMUM EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION FOR APPOINTMENT AS TEACHER GRADE-III (PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER) - RULE 11 OF THE RULES - PRESCRIBES ONLY SECONDARY EXAMINATION OR EQUIVALENT EXAMINATION RECOGNISED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN AND TRAINING QUALIFICATION - CIRCULAR DATED 26.2.1991 ADDING ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS AS ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATION - WITHOUT JURISDICTION - AMENDMENT OF RULE BY EXECUTIVE INSTRUCTIONS - NOT PERMISSIBLE.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner applied for the post of Teacher Grade-III (Primary School Teacher) under the 'Operation Black Board Scheme'. She fulfilled all the minimum requisite qualifications, but her application was rejected because she did not have Mathematics as a subject in her secondary examination as prescribed by a circular dated 26.2.1991.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the circular dated 26.2.1991 adding Elementary Mathematics as an essential qualification for appointment as Teacher Grade-III (Primary School Teacher) was without jurisdiction and illegal. The court further held that the executive authority does not derive jurisdiction from any authority to modify or amend the minimum educational requirements prescribed in the Rules.
Issues: Whether the academic, technical qualification and experience as provided in Rule 11 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishad Rules, 1959 can be amended by departmental instructions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Rules are exhaustive and the executive authority does not have the jurisdiction to modify or amend the minimum educational requirements prescribed in the Rules. Therefore, the circular dated 26.2.1991 was illegal and the petitioner was entitled to be considered for appointment.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Teacher Gr. III, within a period of three months from the date of the filing of certified copy of this order before the opposite party No. 3.
S.N. Category of Post Post from which appointment can be made by promotion Minimum experience and qualification required for promotion Remarks. 2. Primary School Teachers (i)Holders of untrained matric grade Must be matric and trained The minimum qualification required for direct requirment in appointment can respect of women candiates shall be middle standard or concerned course of training conducted by insititutions recognised by the State Govt. or the Central Govt. (ii) Holders of trained middle Grade Must have passed Matric
"11. Academic qualifications and qualifying service: - A recruit to the various categories of service must possess the minimum educational qualification and experience detailed in schedule to these rules."