SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1555

ARUN MISHRA, PRAKASH TATIA
Shanti Lal – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Sandeep Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R.S. Mankad, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This intra-court appeal has been preferred to challenge the judgment dated 6-8-2009 passed by the single Bench of this Court by which the appellant writ petition No. 4300/2005 has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs-respondents Nos. 3 and 4 filed the suit for declaration and injunction under Sections 88 and 188 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1955 for short) against their father appellant (defendant) on the ground that the land in question is ancestral land. According to the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 after the death of their grand-father Mohan Lal, the property devolved upon the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 and upon the appellant (father of the respondents Nos. 3 and 4), therefore, they may be declared Khatedar tenant of the land in question. They also sought the relief of injunction against their own father the appellant that the appellant may not interfere in the peaceful possession of the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 over the land in question. In the suit before the Asstt. Collector, the present appellant filed a written statement and raised objection that his sister Kamla being the daughter of deceased










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top