SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 258

M.C.JAIN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Lichman – Respondent


Advocates:
For the State: Dev Lal Vyas, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. The State has filed this petition under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, against the order dated 3-10-1982, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parbatsa whereby the learned Magistrate held that the recovery memo being signed by the accused, is inadmissible in evidence, as it amounts to confession made by the accused to a police officer.

2. The non-petitioner Lichman was prosecuted for the offence under Section 4/2, Rajasthan Prohibition Act. On an information by a Mukhbir, the S. H. O., Police Station, Pilwa, along with the police party laid an ambush and intercepted the accused, who was proceeding on a Motor Cycle RJZ 8267. On checking, it was found that on the rear seat of the Motor Cycle there was a black rubber tube filled with liquor. It was found that it was an illicit liquor containing about 20 bottles. The liquor was seized in the presence of Motbirs Bhanwar Lal and Kana Ram and a recovery memo was prepared. Besides the Motbirs, the recovery memo was also got signed by the accused. During the course of evidence an objection was raised on behalf of the accused that the recovery memo is inadmissible in evidence under Section 25, Evidence Act. Th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top