SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Naveen Chandra Kasliwal – Appellant
Versus
LIC of India – Respondent
(i) Contributory Provident Fund, as per Rules.
(ii) Gratuity, as per Rules and due and admissible.
(iii) Payment under Group Insurance Scheme.
(iv) Payment against unavailed privilege leave etc.
Smt. Sushila unfortunately met with an accident and sustained serious fracture over her leg. She therefore sought voluntary retirement with immediate effect and was allowed to retire voluntary w.e.f. April 24, 1998. Smt. Sushila thereafter died on May 7, 1998. The petitioner vide representation dated June 24, 1998 requested respondent No.2 to make payment in lieu of claim under Group Term Insurance of his late wife Smt. Sushila. But respondent No.2 vide letter d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.