SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1088

P.P.NAOLEKAR, G.S.NQSRA, J.C.VERMA
Mayara David – Appellant
Versus
Shri Vimal Wilson – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This is a reference made by the Family Court under section 10/17 of the Indian Divorce Act for confirming the judgment and decree dated 10.4.1995 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Kota in between the parties.

2. A divorce petition under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act was moved before the Family Court. The parties were married on 27.4.1992 in accordance with the Christian rites. The divorce petition was moved on the ground of fraud, deceit. It was also alleged that the respondent even though was posing that he was earning about 25,000/- per month, but lateron found that he was un-employed person. The respondent had been harassing the petitioner for bringing insufficient dowry and was even giving beatings to the petitioner. She is said to have turned out of the house on 27.7.1992, when she was not able to meet out the demand of one lac. The respondent even though had appeared and filed the written statement, but later on absented from the court and, therefore, was proceeded ex parte. The statement of the petitioner was recorded. He (sic She ?) had supported her allegations. She has also stated that the respondent was living an adulterous life with one Jasmeen



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top