RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
P.P.Naolekar, G.S.Nqsra, J.C.Verma, JJ.
Smt. Mayara David - Appellant
Versus
Shri Vimal Wilson - Respondent
F.B. Civil reference No.37 of 1995.
Decided On : 24-03-2000
Divorce - Indian Divorce Act - Confirmation of Decree
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a divorce petition under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, where the petitioner alleged fraud, deceit, harassment for insufficient dowry, and adultery by the respondent.
Finding of the Court:
The Family Court found the respondent guilty of cruelty, desertion, and living an adulterous life, and confirmed the decree of divorce in favor of the petitioner.
Issues: The issues revolved around the allegations of fraud, deceit, harassment, and adultery, and whether they constituted grounds for divorce under the Indian Divorce Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the evidence of ill-treatment, cruelty, and adultery presented by the petitioner, leading to the confirmation of the divorce decree.
Final Decision: The court confirmed the decree of divorce in favor of the petitioner based on the grounds of cruelty, desertion, and adultery.
र 25,000/- per month, but lateron found that he was un-employed person. The respondent had been harassing the petitioner for bringing insufficient dowry and was even giving beatings to the petitioner. She is said to have turned out of the house on 27.7.1992, when she was not able to meet out the demand of र one lac. The respondent even though had appeared and filed the written statement, but later on absented from the court and, therefore, was proceeded ex parte. The statement of the petitioner was recorded. He (sic She ?) had supported her allegations. She has also stated that the respondent was living an adulterous life with one Jasmeen and even was having a girl child from Jasmeen. In this regard reliance was placed on Ex.1, the medical certificate in regard to abortion. The Family Court had found from the evidence produced that the petitioner was being ill-treated and was being meted out cruelty. It was found by the Family Court that the respondent was guilty of cruelty, desertion and living adulterous life.
*******
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.