RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
V.S.Kokje, Arun Madan, JJ.
Surendra Mohan Saxena - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & ors. - Respondent
D.B. Civil Spl. Appeal (Writ) No.271 of 1999.
Decided On : 31-03-2000
PENSIONARY BENEFITS - DELAYED PAYMENT - R.S.R. 286 - The court discussed the provisions of R.S.R. 286, which provides for the payment of provisional pension and gratuity to a gazetted government servant from the date of retirement, irrespective of whether pension papers have been prepared and sent for issuance of pension or not. The court highlighted the failure of the respondent department to comply with the statutory duty under R.S.R. 286, resulting in a delay in settling the pensionary dues. The court also emphasized the statutory duty of the Director Pension Department and the appointing authority in communicating and finalizing pension papers, which were not fulfilled in this case. The judgment referenced legal principles established by the Apex Court in various cases, emphasizing the right to early and expeditious settlement of pension and gratuity, and the entitlement to interest on delayed payment of retiral dues.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a retired government servant, filed a writ petition seeking payment of pensionary benefits and interest on delayed payment. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the limited issue of interest on delayed payment, as the appellant had already been paid all his dues. The appellant then filed a special appeal claiming payment of interest and costs.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was a failure on the part of the respondent department to comply with the statutory duty under R.S.R. 286, resulting in a delay in settling the pensionary dues. The court emphasized the entitlement to interest on delayed payment of retiral dues and allowed the appeal, directing the respondents to pay interest to the appellant.
Issues: The main issue was the entitlement to interest on delayed payment of pensionary benefits, as the appellant had already been paid all his dues. The court also addressed the failure of the respondent department to comply with statutory duties under R.S.R. 286 and R.S.R. 285.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellant was entitled to claim interest for the delayed payment of his retiral dues, citing legal principles established by the Apex Court emphasizing the right to early and expeditious settlement of pension and gratuity, and the entitlement to interest on delayed payment of retiral dues.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were directed to pay interest to the appellant at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of delayed payment of retiral dues. The court also directed the Chief Secretary of the Government of Rajasthan to take initiative to avoid such recurrence of events for the delay in payment of retiral dues in the future.
"286. Payment of provisional pension and gratuity.-(1) A Gazetted Government servant should begin to draw pension from the date he retires from service irrespective of whether pension papers have been prepared and sent to the Director, Pension Department Rajasthan for issue of pension or not. In cases where pension papers have not been prepared and sent to the Director, Pension Department, Rajasthan, the Head of Department shall, after the most careful summary investigation, authorise payment of provisional pension to the extent of 75% of the maximum amount of pension and also of the gratuity to which he is entitled under these rules. If pension papers have been prepared and sent to the Director,
D.S. Nakara Vs. Union of India 1983(1) SCC 305
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.