SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1099

V.S.KOKJE, ARUN MADAN
Surendra Mohan Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This special appeal arises out of order dated 29.7.1998 of the learned Single Judge in aforesaid writ petition, whereby the learned Single Judge while dismissing writ petition of the appellant on limited issue as to the interest on the payment of pensionary and retiral benefits having been granted and made after about two years of his retirement, declined to grant interest over the same.

2. The facts relevant for deciding this appeal, briefly stated, are that admittedly the appellant (petitioner) retired as Dy. Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Rajasthan on attaining his age of superannuation on 31.7.1995, for which an order dated 11.10.94 (Ann.1) was passed in advance by the Director, Animal Husbandry communicating about it to the all concerned, so as to proceed for preparation of pension papers in time. The case of the appellant is that he should have been given pensionary benefits together with gratuity amount on the date of retirement, itself. But despite his several representations, his retrial dues were not settled in time, resulting in sending notice for demand of justice to the department on 10.8.96 (Ann.5), specifically mentioning therein th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top