SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1734

ARUN MADAN
Sukhdev Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Nathu Lal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff appellant challenging the Judgment & decree dt. 9.1.1998 passed by the learned ADJ No.2 Jaipur City, )Jaipur in Civil Suit No. 3/95 (Sukh Dev Prasad v. Nathu Lal) whereby, the suit filed by the plaintiff appellant was dismissed.

2. The facts which are relevant for deciding the appeal briefly stated are that the appellant plaintiff filed a civil suit before DJ Jaipur City Jaipur against the defendant respondent seeking the relief of partition of the suit property and permanent injunction restraining the defendant respondent from transferring, alienating, selling or mortgaging the property to anybody else pending the hearing and disposal of the suit.

3. It was pleaded by the plaintiff that he being a minor at the relevant time, through his next friend (Guardian) had filed a civil suit in the Court of Munsif Garbi, Jaipur against late Shri Ram Karan (the father of defendant Nathu Lal) and Smt. Gulli @ Gulab (the natural mother of plaintiff) seeking partition of the property against his brother. While the plaintiff appellant is said to have been borne through Smt. Gulli alias Gulab the natural mother of the plaintiff while th



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top