SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1383

J.C.VERMA
Mangla Jat – Appellant
Versus
Raju – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. :- This civil misc. appeal has been filed against the order dated 30.7.1997 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur in misc. application by which he had rejected the application under Order 9 Rule 13, C.P.C. filed in MACT Case No. 400/91.

2. The respondents had filed a claim application against the appellants before the MACT, Jaipur which case was transferred to the Court of learned Addl. District Judge-cum-Judge MACT, vide order dated 25.10.1991. It is stated that summons were never served upon the appellants and that they had come to know of the order When his agricultural land was ordered to be auctioned on 5.6.1997 for the amount of the award and On making enquiries, it was found that an ex-parte award had been made on 27.3.1996. Certified copy of the same was obtained which was received on 12.6.1997 and on 16.6.1997, application Under Order 9 Rule 13 was filed supported with an affidavit but the same was dismissed vide impugned order on 30.7.1997. Being aggrieved against the said order, the present misc. appeal has been filed.

3. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the appellant that for the reason that summons were never served upon t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top