SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1765

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Shiv Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Shiv Prasad Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:G.S. Bapna, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. Punishment of dismissal from services was imposed on the petitioner vide order dated 28.1.1977 in a departmental inquiry initiated under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short the CCA Rules). After unsuccessful appeal and review, the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer to quash his dismissal order and seeking reinstatement in the services with all consequential reliefs.

2. Contextual facts depict that the petitioner was appointed as LDC vide order dated 28.9.1961 and posted in the office of Sales Tax Officer Kota. He was promoted to the post of UDC on ad hoc basis vide order dated 26.9.1975 and reverted to the post of LDC vide order dated 26.2.1976. The petitioner was placed under suspension and charge memo was served on him by the Commercial Taxes Officer Circle A Kota under Rule 16 CCA Rules on 14.4.1976. Since the appointing authority of the petitioner was Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes, Kota the charge sheet was served on him vide memo dated 1.10.1976. The petitioner averred that the respondents have neither allowed him to inspect the record nor supplied him the required documents.

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top