M.R.CALLA, ARUN MADAN
Dr. Mool Chand – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
"It is admitted by the counsel for the petitioner that no adverse order has been resulted on account of the adverse entries made in the A.C.R. of 1991- 92 of the petitioner and communicated to the petitioner vide letter dated 25.11.1993 (Annexure-16), that being the case I do not find any good or sufficient reason to admit the writ petition which is directed against the adverse entries. However, it is made clear that if the adverse entries result in any adverse order passed against the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to challenge the adverse order as well as the adverse entries made and communicated to him vide letter dated 25.11.1993 (Annex. 16). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of."
It will be appear from the pleadings of the parties and the contents of the order itself that the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the adverse remarks recorded in the ACR of the appellant for the year 1991-92 which were communicated to him on 25
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.