SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1808

M.R.CALLA, ARUN MADAN
Dr. Mool Chand – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.2.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge. The order dated 15.2.2001 is reproduced, as under:

"It is admitted by the counsel for the petitioner that no adverse order has been resulted on account of the adverse entries made in the A.C.R. of 1991- 92 of the petitioner and communicated to the petitioner vide letter dated 25.11.1993 (Annexure-16), that being the case I do not find any good or sufficient reason to admit the writ petition which is directed against the adverse entries. However, it is made clear that if the adverse entries result in any adverse order passed against the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to challenge the adverse order as well as the adverse entries made and communicated to him vide letter dated 25.11.1993 (Annex. 16). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of."

It will be appear from the pleadings of the parties and the contents of the order itself that the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the adverse remarks recorded in the ACR of the appellant for the year 1991-92 which were communicated to him on 25
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top