SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1886

ARUN MADAN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ram Swaroop Bhargava – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This writ petition having been filed by the State of Rajasthan and not by the persons who were private respondents No. 2 to 9 before the Tribunal, arises out of a judgment dated 26.3.97 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal Jaipur, ('Tribunal') in Appeal No. 508/97 of the present respondent whereby the Tribunal issued following directions -

"In view of the discussions made above the appeal is partially accepted and the respondent State is directed to prepare and finally publish the inter-se-seniority list in the light of the directions given by the Apex Court in the judgment stated above i.e. Vijay Singh Deora etc. v. State, Civil Appeal No. 14985 of 1995 out of SLP (C) No. 21784/96 decided on 3.10.96 (reported in 1997 (3) SCC 118) and to consider the claim of the appellant for promotion to the next higher post accordingly and if the appellant is found fit for promotion against vacancies of earlier years then to revise or modify the impugned orders accordingly with all consequential benefits so allowed to his juniors."

This petition has come up in second inning by way of remand by the Division Bench of this Court in State of Rajasthan v. R.S. Bhargav






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top