2002 Supreme(Raj) 1502
KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Vinod Baid – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
For the Petitioner in all the revisions:Mr. Milind Gokhele, Mr. M.I. Beg, Advocates.
For the Respondent No. 2 in Rev. No. 140/2002:Mr. A.K. Bhandari, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhay Jain, Advocate.
For the Rev. No. 138/2002:Mr. Narain Singh, Advocate.
For the State: Mr. Madhav Mitra, P.P.
JUDGMENT
1. - These three revision petitions by petitioner Vinod Baid involve more or less similar facts and an identical question of law, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.
2. In all these revision petitions, the petitioner has challenged the orders taking cognizance of the offence under Sections 420 and 406, Indian Penal Code.
3. In Cr. Revision No. 140/2002, a complaint was filed against the petitioner on 26.11.1997 and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate vide its order dated 1.4.1998 sent the complaint under Section 156(3), Criminal Procedure Code to the concerned police station for investigation. There-upon, FIR was registered on 4.4.1998 and the police after investigation submitted negative report. On a notice having been issued, the complainant Vishnu Swaroop Baldeva filed a protest petition on 2.5.2002 and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence.
4. In Cr. Revision No. 138/2002, a complaint was filed by complainant Narain Singh against the petitioner on 3.4.2000 and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate vide its order dated 5.4.2000 sent the complaint under Section 156(3), Criminal Procedure Code to the concerned police stat
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
