2007 Supreme(Raj) 1991
R.M.LODHA, R.S.CHAUHAN
Bharat Bhushan Basotia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 9 of 2006
For the Appellant:Bajrang Lal Sharma, Senior Advocate with the Raj Sharma, A.K. Bhandari, Senior Advocate with Anant Bhandari and Ashok Gaur, Advocates.
For the State of Rajasthan-respondent No. 1:Mohan Singh Raghav, Additional Advocate General.
For the Respondents No. 2:S.N. Kumawat, Advocate.
For the Respondents No. 3:A.K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 4:B.C. Chirania, Advocate.
For the Applicant:Ganesh Meena, Advocate.
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 7 of 2006
For the Appellant:Dharamveer Tholia, Advocate.
For the State of Rajasthan-respondent No. 1:Mohan Singh Raghav, Additional Advocate General.
For the Respondents No. 2:S.N. Kumawat, Advocate.
For the Respondents No. 3:A.K. Sharma, Advocate.
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) N. 1324 of 2005
For the Appellant:Bajrang Lal Sharma, Senior Advocate with the Raj Sharma, A.K. Bhandari, Senior Advocate with Anant Bhandari and Ashok Gaur, Advocates.
For the Rajasthan-respondent No. 1:Mohan Singh Raghav, Additional Advocate General.
For the Respondents No. 2:S.N. Kumawat, Advocate.
For the Respondents No. 3:A.K. Sharma, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - This group of three appeals arises from the common judgment dated 19th October, 2005 passed by the Single Judge and raises common issues, and, therefore, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. On 4th August, 2003, the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short, 'RPSC') issued a notification for holding examination for the posts of Munsif & Judicial Magistrate under the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 1995 (for short 'RJS Rules').
3. The relevant portion regarding vacant posts in the advertisement is reproduced as it is : | dze0 la0 | inksa dh dqy la[;k | lkekU; in | vuqlwfpr tkfr | vkjf{kr in jktLFkku dh vuqlwfpr tutkfr | vU; fiNM+k oxZ |
| . | . | lkekU; efgyk | lkekU; efgyk | lkekU; efgyk | lkekU; efgyk |
| 1- | 89 | 38 09 | 12 02 | 08 02 | 15 03 |
| 2- | 19 | & & | 07 01 | 08 03 | & & |
4. The advertisement was issued for 108 posts in all. There were division of seats and reservation in each category of Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) and Other Back Ward Classes (OBC). The advertisement clarified that there was category wise horizontal reservation for women candidates and in case of non
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
