2002 Supreme(Raj) 1591
S.K.KESHOTE
Kamla Devi – Appellant
Versus
Hari Ram – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Defendant Petitioner:Mr. Sudesh Bansal, Advocate.
For the Plaintiff Respondent:Mr. U.M. Jain, Advocate.
Judgement Key Points
Please provide the legal document content (inside tags or otherwise) and your specific query or task (e.g., summarize key points, extract clauses, identify risks). I'll analyze it using the specified referencing format, such as (!) (!) for distinct references.
JUDGMENT
1. - These two revision petitions though arise from the two different suits, but the suits were between the same parties and pertaining to the eviction of tenant from the suit premises. Identical orders have been passed in these two suits on the applications filed by the plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code. These revision petitions are being taken up for hearing and are being decided together by this common order. Both these revision petitions are also ordered to be tagged together and that is an another reason for which these matters are to be taken up together for hearing and decision.
2. For the decision of these matters, the facts and grounds of challenge to the orders are being taken from S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 191/2001.
3. The suit for eviction on the ground of default in payment of rent, sub-letting and non-user of the tenanted premises has been filed by the plaintiff respondents hereinafter referred as the plaintiffs) against late Shri Jawari Lal. Shri Jawari Lal is the father of the present defendant petitioners.
4. The premises is a shop situated at Holi Dada, Ajmer bearing Municipal No. 7/220.
5. Written statements in the suit was filed b
Click Here to Read the rest of this document