SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 2737

MAHESH BHAGWATI
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Mukund Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the State: B.K. Sharma, P.P.
For the accused-respondent: None present.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 17 June, 1995 rendered by Special Judge (Sati Niwaran) and Additional Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, whereby the accused respondent Mukund Singh was acquitted in the offence under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code.

2. The prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as follows:-

That the complainant Kailash Kanwar was residing in a rented house B-103 and 104 of Shimbhu Singh situated in Nityanand Nagar. The sister and mother of the accused-respondent Mukund Singh were also residing in the same house on rent. It is alleged that on 17th June, 1994 at about 3.30 pm, the complainant Kailash Kanwar had gone out of the house and her daughter Sannu aged 6 years was sleeping in a room. On return to her house, she found her daughter weeping. Her daughter told that Mukund Singh had come, taken of her panties and ravished her. She was complaining pain on her vagina. The complainant looked at the panties she was wearing and found that it was blood stained. She found her vagina also bleeding. The complainant submitted a written report Ex.P/1 in police station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur whereupon police lodged FIR Ex.P/2 and comm




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top