SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 1421

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
M.A.A.Khan, J.
State of Rajasthan & Anr - Appellants
Versus
Sanwal Ram & ors. - Respondents
S.B.Cri. Appeal No. 169 of 1985.
Decided On : 20-10-1997

For the Appellant:Mr. K.N. Shrimal and Mr. Rajendra Soni, Advocates.
For the State: Mr. S. Pathak, P.P.
For the Accused-Respondent:Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi, Advocate.

An assembly of persons may not be unlawful in its inception, but it may become unlawful by the subsequent acts of its members.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY - SECTION 147 INDIAN PENAL CODE - INTERPRETATION - OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 353 AND 332 INDIAN PENAL CODE - CONVICTION - SENTENCE.

Fact of the Case:

The respondents, along with 50-55 others, assembled in a school to complain about the mismanagement of the school and misappropriation of funds by the Head Master, Banwari Lal. During a meeting with the Deputy District Education Officer (DDEO), the respondents and their colleagues assaulted Banwari Lal, causing him multiple injuries. The respondents were charged with offences under sections 147, 353, and 332 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The trial court acquitted the respondents of all charges except for causing simple hurt under section 323 IPC and released them under the Probation of Offenders Act.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the assembly of more than 50 persons was not unlawful in its inception as the object of the assembly was to make a complaint against the teaching staff, which was a legal right. However, the court found that the respondents' act of assaulting Banwari Lal in the course of the meeting constituted offences under sections 353 and 332 IPC, as they voluntarily caused hurt to a public servant in the execution of his duty.

Issues: 1. Whether the assembly of more than 50 persons was an unlawful assembly under section 147 IPC? 2. Whether the respondents' act of assaulting Banwari Lal constituted offences under sections 353 and 332 IPC?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the assembly was not unlawful in its inception as the object of the assembly was to make a complaint against the teaching staff, which was a legal right. The court relied on the explanation to section 141 IPC, which states that an assembly which was not unlawful when it assembled may subsequently become an unlawful assembly. 2. The court held that the respondents' act of assaulting Banwari Lal constituted offences under sections 353 and 332 IPC, as they voluntarily caused hurt to a public servant in the execution of his duty. The court relied on the fact that Banwari Lal was discharging his official duties as a public servant when he was assaulted by the respondents.

Final Decision: The High Court set aside the trial court's judgment and order, convicted the respondents of offences under sections 353 and 332 IPC, and sentenced each of them to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- for the offence under section 332 IPC, or in case of default of payment of fine, to undergo R.I. for six months each.

JUDGMENT

1. :- Appeal under section 378(1)(3) by the State of Rajasthan and Revisions under section 397/401 Criminal Procedure Code by Banwari Lal injured complainant are directed against the judgment and order dated 18.10.84 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate Kishangarh Bas (Alwar), in criminal case No. 94 of 1981 State Vs. Sanwan Ram and ors. , acquitted the respondents of offences under section 147, 353 and 332 Indian Penal Code and, in-stead, held them guilty of offence under section 323 Indian Penal Code and released them under section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act 1960 to keep peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one year. The respondents, reportedly, did not challenge such order before appellate or revisional court.

2. Relevant facts are these:

On July 9, 1981 PW1 Mahendra Bhardwaj, Deputy Distt. Education Officer, Boys Education, Rajasthan (DEO) had gone to inspect Govt. Higher Primary School at Rajwada under Police Station Mundawar in District Alwar, PW1 Banwari Lal was working as Head Master at the said institution at that time. When the too were busy in conducting the inspection business the present respondents alongwith 50 or 55 others reached the school premises and assembled in the Varandah. On quarry it was known that the respondents and their colleagues wanted to meet Shri Mahendra Singh D.E.O. Shri Mahendra Singh asked Shri Banwari Lal Head Master to make sitting arrangements for the respondents and their colleagues in the adjoining room. After Shri Mahendra Singh had done that the respondents and their colleagues got themselves seated on the carpet, spread in the room. Shri Mahendra Singh D.E.O. invited the villagers to place their grevience. They moved an application Ex.P4 to him and complained that due to differences and disputes amongst the teachers the education of the children was adversely affected. They further complained of financial irregularities and required Shri Banwari Lal Head Master to place the accounts for their inspection. Shri Banwari Lal allegedly submitted that the higher authority was already there in the institution and they should make their complaint in that behalf to the D.D.E.O. and he might look into such complaints. This allegedly infuriated the respondents who cought hold of Banwari Lal Head Master and started beating him with fists and kicks. They dragged him outside of the room and assaulted him badly. The school staff came to the rescue of Shri Banwari Lal and he was booked in a room in order to save from sustaining further injuries at the hands of the respondents. The respondents then returned. Shri Banwari Lal Head Master submitted a written report Ex. P1 to the D.D.E.O. who forwarded the same to the police. A case under section 147, 332, and 353 Indian Penal Code was registered at Police Station Maundawar by PW 5 Ramdhan A.S.I. and after investigation PW 7 Subey Singh S.H.O. submitted a police report under section 173 Criminal Procedure Code against the present respondents numbering seven.

3. The learned Magistrate framed charges for offences under section 147, 353 and 332 Indian Penal Code against the respondents and on their pleading not guilty tried them according to law. The prosecution examined eight witnesses in all at the trial of the respondents. Shri Banwari Head Master, PW Shri Mahendra Bhardwaj D.D.E.O., PW 3 Sanwan Ram, PW 4 Khub Ram and PW 5 Ram Singh Asstt. Teachers in that institution at the relevant time stated all the facts, as stated above. PW8 Dr. Shri Chandra who had examined PW1 Banwari Lal Head Master at 7.30 A.M. on 10.4.81 at Primary Health Centre Mandawar stated to have found the following injuries on his person:

"1. Bruise C swelling 3 CM X 3 CM, on the right Parietal eminence, blunt.

2. Swelling C Bruise, 4 C.M. X 3 C.M. on the left parietal eminence.

3. Bruise 5 CM X 3 CM. On the right side back scapular region

4. Bruise C Swelling 3 C.M. X 2.5 C.M. (Three) on the left side back supra scapular region.

5. Bruise 2.5 C.M. X 2 C.M




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top