SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 902

RAJENDRA SAXENA
Raghuveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner through this writ petition has alleged that his fundamental right for speedy trial as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India has been violated as he has been facing trial since 15.5.1984 and not a single witness has been examined by the prosecution so far and prayed that the entire proceedings in criminal case No.59/87 pending before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) cum Judicial Magistrate No.12, Jaipur City be quashed and he be discharged.

2. Briefly the relevant facts are that on the report dated 1.8.83 lodged by the Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Brahmpuri, A-Zone-1, Jaipur against Thakur Kalyan Singh, Banskho House, Ganga Pole, Jaipur for theft of electricity by its unmetered consumption, crime No.90/83 was registered at PS Brahampuri vide FIR Ann.2. However, the SHO after investigation submitted a charge sheet on 16.5.84 against petitioner Raghuveer Singh for the offence under section 379 Indian Penal Code and Section 39 of the Indian Electricity Act on the basis of statements of certain witnesses in the court of Munsif Magistrate, Jaipur.

3. A perusal of the certified copies of the order shee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top